Technology

59696 readers

5278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

574

Man sues Apple for accidentally exposing his infidelity (appleinsider.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Stopthatgirl7 to c/technology

144 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A British man is ridiculously attempting to sue Apple following a divorce, caused by his wife finding messages to a prostitute he deleted from his iPhone that were still accessible on an iMac.

In the last years of his marriage, a man referred to as "Richard" started to use the services of prostitutes, without his wife's knowledge. To try and keep the communications secret, he used iMessages on his iPhone, but then deleted the messages.

Despite being careful on his iPhone to cover his tracks, he didn't count on Apple's ecosystem automatically synchronizing his messaging history with the family iMac. Apparently, he wasn't careful enough to use Family Sharing for iCloud, or discrete user accounts on the Mac.

The Times reports the wife saw the message when she opened iMessage on the iMac. She also saw years of messages to prostitutes, revealing a long period of infidelity by her husband.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Nurse_Robot 20 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Guy shouldn't have cheated

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I was a huge Signal advocate at one time and would try to get everyone to install it and use it. Man, woman or child, I didn't care who it was. I was worse than a crypto-bro trying to jam BTC down everyone's throat.

I was chatting with a group of ladies at work and got a few of them to install it. When they did, Signal pushed notifications of them connecting to my wife's phone.

Needless to say, I got questioned fairly intensely about why there were other girls connecting with me on Signal.

I wasn't very keen on Signal after that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. I've never liked those notifications but I've seen people on Signal message boards defend them to the death. There's no privacy issue! You're only getting it because they're already saved in your phone! This is a good scenario to illustrate the point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

You can just switch it off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So your wife had them in her contacts, got notified her contacts joined signal, and the link to you is...?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This was an old feature, before it could be disabled.

So, if my wife was in my contact list first and I was in hers, she would get notified when someone was added to mine.

It was something like, "X has joined Signal on Y's phone!!" or some bullshit like that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

This is /technology not /morales

[–] MutilationWave 4 points 5 months ago

What does the Morales family have to do with this?

[–] Skanky 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You misspelled /morels

[–] atrielienz 1 points 5 months ago

What do mushrooms have to do with this?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

This is /technology, not /religion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Why can't we discuss both if both apply?

[–] cheese_greater 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Two things can be true lol. He should have insisted on disappearing messages and Signal use for the app but a lot of people are quite resistant to the notion that they don't get to "keep" your conversations forever for whatever purpose they choose