this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1323 points (93.3% liked)

People Twitter

5021 readers
1141 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 95 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: I did not watch Divergent.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It was derivative. You missed out on nothing. Hunger games did it way better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Okay, most of this is fair play, but saying hunger games did it better? You take that back right now.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Divergent just didn't have the nuance, character depth or world building that the Hunger Games had and I'll stand by that opinion. The divergent movie was a let down to tbh, the book was better. Still not as good as the hunger games tho.

[–] VindictiveJudge 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is the book version of the conspiracy better? I watched the first movie and thought that the supposedly smart caste was pretty braindead.

[–] hydrospanner 2 points 3 months ago

It seemed like the entire setup was pretty braindead honestly.

Entertaining enough, but nowhere near plausible enough to really get invested in the story.

Same with Hunger Games, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Hunger Games depicted revolution's harsh but necessary sides in a realistic way, and that elevates it above all other YA I've ever read. Granted I stopped reading YA novels after 16 but still.

Katniss has a real personality, real desires, and loses things because she (thought) she decided to lead a revolution. Only to find out that she wasn't in charge at all and only a figurehead at best, and herself became a victim of the revolution. Nonetheless the revolution was absolutely necessary.

The world of the Hunger Games is much bigger than the teenage protagonists and that's... missing in most of young adult fiction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

That's why The Hunger Games was successful I believe. They treated the audience not as children, but as adults who can consider complex ideas. They just want to read about people their age. Most YA considers their audience as little more than hormone filled idiots.

[–] FlyingSquid -3 points 3 months ago

I didn't watch either. I don't feel like I'm missing anything. There are so many other excellent dystopian films-

Brazil, Children of Men, Blade Runner, Logan's Run, Gattaca.

I guess I prefer such movies that aren't YA-oriented... although the BBC TV adaptation of The Tripods back in the 80s was amazing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Oh yeah. I take offense really at the implication that I would have watched it.